1 . |
Direction (Q. 1 - 5) : Below is given a passage followed by several possible inferences which can be drawn from the facts stated in the passage. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.
Advertising pundits had at the beginning of the year made some grim predictions for a long dull period of uncertainty and low growth. What they failed to predict, or fought shy of, was a rough patch of unimaginative advertising. The year proved them right, though it brought in its wake some odd wave of cheer in the form of international honour for some agencies, new accounts worth crores for others. surprise account losses for some bigwigs, international tie-ups and so on. But by and large the mood was low-key.
The predictions of the advertising pundits failed.
|
|
Answer & Explanation
Answer : Option
D
|
|
Explanation : |
|
In fact. 'the year proved them nght".
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 . |
The year saw quite a deal of unimaginative advertising.
|
|
Answer & Explanation
Answer : Option
A
|
|
Explanation : |
|
Though the advertising pundits failed to predict it, the year did have "a rough patch of unimaginative advertising".
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 . |
Some of the ad agencies oflndia won global awards.
|
|
Answer & Explanation
Answer : Option
B
|
|
Explanation : |
|
The passage talks of "international honour". Though "international honour" can't be definitely interpreted as "global awards". a probability can't be denied.
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 . |
Lintas got certain new accounts
|
|
Answer & Explanation
Answer : Option
C
|
|
Explanation : |
|
No particular ad agency has been mentioned. So how can we say anything about Limas
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 . |
Some of the global ad agencies dissociated themselves from lndia.
|
|
Answer & Explanation
Answer : Option
D
|
|
Explanation : |
|
There is no definite Information regarding this. However, this seems to be a remote possibility because such an important Ifappening must have been mentioned along with other happenings such as "new accounts", "surprise account losses". "international tieups"etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 . |
Direction (Q. 6 - 10) : In the following questions the symbols #, ⋆, @, $ and = are used with the following meanings:
A # B means A is greater than B.
A ⋆B means A is greater than or equal to B.
A @ B means A is equal to B.
A $ B means A is lesser than B.,
A = B means A is lesser than or equal to B.
Now in each of the following questions, assuming the three Statements to be true, find which of the two conclusions 1 and II given below them is/are definitely true.
Statements: S = T, T⋆U, T$V
Conclusions: I.TSS ll.U=V
|
|
Answer & Explanation
Answer : Option
D
|
|
Explanation : |
|
S≤ T ... (i); T ≥ ü ... (ii); T < V ... (iii) From (i), T≥ S. Hence I is not true From (ii) and (iii), U ≤ T< V o r U < V. But II is U ≤, V, Hence II is also not true.
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 . |
Statements: K#L. K ⋆ M, M$N
Conclusions: I. L@M II. M@K
|
|
Answer & Explanation
Answer : Option
D
|
|
Explanation : |
|
K > L.... ( i ) ; K ≥ M ... (ii); M < N ... (iii)
From (i) and (ii). no relationship can be established
between L and M. Hence I is not true.
From (ii). M ≤ K. Hence II is also not true.
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 . |
Statements: F = G F ⋆ H, F = K
Conclusions: I. G = K II. K.SH
|
|
Answer & Explanation
Answer : Option
D
|
|
Explanation : |
|
F ≤ G ... (i); F ≥H ... (ii); F≤ K... (iii)
No relationship can be established between G and K. Hence 1 cannot be established
From (ii) and (iii). K ≥ F ≥H or K ≥ H. Hence I is false.
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 . |
Statements: T @ S. R $ Q. Q @ T
Conclusions: l.~Q ⋆ S II.S#R
|
|
Answer & Explanation
Answer : Option
B
|
|
Explanation : |
|
T = S ... (i), R < Q ... (ii); Q = T ..(iii)
From (i) and (iii). Q = S. Hence I is not true
Combining (i), (ii) and (iii), S = T= Q > R or S > R. Hence II is true.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 . |
Statements: B#C, C$D, E$C
Conclusions: I. D# B II. D = C
|
|
Answer & Explanation
Answer : Option
D
|
|
Explanation : |
|
B > C ... ( i ) ; C < D ... (ii); E < C ... (iii)
No relationship can be established between B and D Hence I can't be established From (ii), D > C Hence II is false.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|